• id Indonesia
  • en English
Thursday, March 30, 2023
  • ABOUT US
Indonesia for Global Justice
  • HOME
  • NEWS
  • PUBLICATION
  • OPINION
No Result
View All Result
“A Global Justice Order through Social Movements”s
  • HOME
  • NEWS
  • PUBLICATION
  • OPINION
No Result
View All Result
Indonesia for Global Justice
No Result
View All Result
Home Publication

Indonesia Fishery Subsidies

June 8, 2021
in Publication
Reading Time: 5 mins read
Indonesia Fishery Subsidies

Photo by artem beliaikin

1.8k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Background:

Overcapitalisation of the global fishery resources is a major threat not only to sustainability of marine resources, but also to food security, livelihoods and economies (Tipping & Irschlinger 2020).  WTO negotiations on fisheries subsidies were launched at the Doha Ministerial Conference in 2001. WTO (2002) defined Fisheries subsidies as ‘government actions or inactions that are specific to the fishery industry and that modifies- by increasing or decreasing-the potential profits by the industry in the short-, medium- or long-term.’ The creation of fishery subsidies disciplines has been called for because some fishery subsidies have been criticized as threats to sustainability of the marine resources which contribute to many problems including overfishing, overcapacity, illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing. Indonesia

The Eleventh Ministerial Conference did not achieve substantive outcomes in negotiation regarding fishery subsidies due to a lack of a common viewpoint on the effect of subsidies and conflict of interest between participants.

WTO (2002) classified Fishery subsidies into four main categories:

Category 1: Direct financial transfers- includes all direct payments by the governments to the fishery industry (for example investment grants)

Category 2: service and indirect financial transfers- any other active and explicit government intervention but which is covered in Category 1(for example tax and duty exemptions)

Category 3: interventions with different short and long-term effects- government interventions that have a negative economic impact on the industry in the short-term but ultimately result in long-term benefits (for example environmental protection programmes)

Category 4: lack of intervention- lack of government intervention which do not imply a cost to the government and their value to the industry is implicit (for example lack of management measures)

Fishery subsidies can be classified into the following three categories based on the effects (Sumaila et al. 2019):

1. Beneficial subsidies: investments in the promotion of fishery resources conservation and management (for example fishery management)
2. Capacity-enhancing subsidies: programs that currently or have the potential to encourage fishing capacity to develop to a point where resource exploitation exceeds the maximum sustainable yield (MYS), effectively resulting in the overexploitation of natural capital assets (for example fuel subsidy).
3. Ambiguous subsidies: subsidies having the potential to lead to either sustainable management or overexploitation of the fishery) resources, really depend on situations (for example vessel buyback).

Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 14.6

By 2020, prohibit certain forms of fisheries subsidies which contribute to overcapacity and overfishing, and eliminate subsidies that
contribute to IUU fishing, and refrain from introducing new such subsidies, recognizing that appropriate and effective special
and differential treatment for developing and least developed countries should be an integral part of the WTO fisheries subsidies negotiation.
Key Components of the WTO Fishery Subsidies negotiations:
 
–   Prohibition of Subsidies to IUU fishing
–   Prohibition of Subsidies Concerning Overfished Stock
–   Prohibition of Subsidies to Overfishing and Overcapacity

Fishery in Indonesia
According to Notohamijoya, Wiyata & Billah (2019):

  • The current estimation of Indonesia fishery resources annually is 12.54 million tons.
  • Fish and seafood are leading sources of protein for Indonesian population, taking up to 52% of their protein intake.
  • Small scale fishery accounts for nearly 90% of Indonesia fishing vessel ownership.
  • 80% of the total Indonesian fishermen are living below the poverty line.
  • Special and Differential Treatment: Indonesia is proposing to retain fishery subsidies as measures to alleviate poverty.
  • Dominated by small scale fisheries, the structure of Indonesia fishery is not considered as damaging to the environment.
  • A balance between small scale fishermen’s welfare and the protection of environment is the key to ensure the success of fishery subsidies.
  • An effective fishery management is required in Indonesia as currently large scale fishermen are more likely to enjoy fishery subsidies than small scale fishermen due to lack of transparency.
Effect on Small Scale Fishery
According to PANG (2020):

–   Fishermen in Small scale fishery are not protected or supported.
–   Compliance and procedural issues may lead to unintentional breaches.
–   It is difficult in distinguishing actual IUU fishing from traditional, informal, small scale fishing that often takes place in developing countries.
–   Fishing stock assessment are burdensome on developing countries.
–   Greater clarity is needed for provision on flag state.
–   Prohibiting subsidies on capital cost and operational cost slows down the development of fisheries sector in developing economies.
–   Decision-making power in resource management will be taken away from local communities.
–   The current proposals for Special and Differential Treatment are not sufficient.
– It is important to ensure that there is sufficient carve-out to allow small scale fishermen’s access to necessary subsidies to lower capital and operating costs for the development of their communities.


Reference:
Notohamijoya A, Wiyata, A & Billah M 2019, Sustainable fisheries subsidies for small scale fisheries in Indonesia, ICESSD.
Pacific Network on Globalization (PANG) 2020, Big impacts for small scale fishers.
Sumaila, U, Ebrahim, N, Schuhbauer, A, Skerritt, D, Li, Y, Kim, H, Mallory, T, Lam, V & Pauly, D 2019, ‘Updated estimates and analysis of global fisheries subisidies’, Marine Policy, vol.109, no.130695.
Tipping, A & Irschlinger, T 2020, WTO negotiations on fisheries subsidies: What’s the state of play? GSI policy brief, International Institute for Sustainable Development.
WTO 2002, A fishery subsidies guide, viewed 15 January 2021, A FISHERIES SUBSIDIES GUIDE (fao.org).

More readings on Fishery Subsidies:
Visit WTO at World Trade Organization – Home page – Global trade (wto.org)
Visit Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations at Home | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (fao.org)

Download: Indonesian-Fisheries-SubsidyUnduh

PDF 📄
Tags: FisheryWTO
Previous Post

Press Release: ASEAN’s Fate Hangs in an RCEP Balance. ASEAN set for economic losses if RCEP is ratified COVID recovery prospects compromised

Next Post

Global talks on Fisheries subsidies must target big subsidisers not development

Related Posts

Global talks on Fisheries subsidies must target big subsidisers not development
Pers Realese

Global talks on Fisheries subsidies must target big subsidisers not development

July 13, 2021
Pers Realese

Press Release: WTO Must Immediately Pass the TRIPS Waiver for Vaccine Access Equity

March 11, 2021
Load More
Next Post
Global talks on Fisheries subsidies must target big subsidisers not development

Global talks on Fisheries subsidies must target big subsidisers not development

Please login to join discussion

covid-19 widget

Popular Post

  • Ahli Tekankan Pentingnya Persetujuan DPR dalam Perjanjian Internasional

    Ahli Tekankan Pentingnya Persetujuan DPR dalam Perjanjian Internasional

    2698 shares
    Share 1079 Tweet 675
  • Penghapusan Status B3 FABA dan SBE dalam PP No 22 Tahun 2021 tentang Penyelenggaraan Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup dalam Tinjauan Sustainable Trade

    2682 shares
    Share 1073 Tweet 671
  • Penenggelaman Kapal Asing

    2237 shares
    Share 895 Tweet 559
  • DIPLOMASI VAKSIN COVID-19 INDONESIA: “Tantangan Akses Publik Atas Vaksin dan Layanan Kesehatan Berkeadilan”

    1195 shares
    Share 478 Tweet 299
  • Isu Lingkungan Hidup dan Iklim di WTO: Untungkan Negara Maju, Rugikan Negara Berkembang

    1153 shares
    Share 461 Tweet 288
No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • NEWS
  • PUBLICATION
  • OPINION
  • id Indonesia
  • en English

Indonesia For Global Justice© 2020

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used.